Canada vs Mauritius: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (

Canada
76.79
in 2019
Mauritius
76.34
in 2019
Canada rank
130th
Mauritius rank
132nd

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( over time

  • Canada
  • Mauritius
020406080201420162019

How they compare

Canada currently reports 76.79 against 76.34 in Mauritius, a difference of 0.45.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Canada has been ahead every year.

Canada ranks 130th and Mauritius ranks 132nd of 188 countries.

Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) (, Canada or Mauritius?
Canada, at 76.79 against 76.34 in Mauritius as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( between Canada and Mauritius?
0.45, with Canada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Mauritius?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Canada and Mauritius rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) (?
Canada ranks 130th and Mauritius ranks 132nd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the cost for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.