Brunei Darussalam vs Republic of Moldova: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD)
Brunei Darussalam
92.86
in 2019
Republic of Moldova
94.13
in 2019
Brunei Darussalam rank
45th
Republic of Moldova rank
41st
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Brunei Darussalam
- Republic of Moldova
How they compare
Republic of Moldova currently reports 94.13 against 92.86 in Brunei Darussalam, a difference of 1.27.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Republic of Moldova has been ahead every year.
Brunei Darussalam ranks 45th and Republic of Moldova ranks 41st of 190 countries.
Republic of Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd), Brunei Darussalam or Republic of Moldova?
- Republic of Moldova, at 94.13 against 92.86 in Brunei Darussalam as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) between Brunei Darussalam and Republic of Moldova?
- 1.27, with Republic of Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei Darussalam and Republic of Moldova?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Brunei Darussalam and Republic of Moldova rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Brunei Darussalam ranks 45th and Republic of Moldova ranks 41st of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.