Botswana vs Namibia: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (

Botswana
90.48
in 2019
Namibia
91.07
in 2019
Botswana rank
63rd
Namibia rank
60th

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( over time

  • Botswana
  • Namibia
020406080100201420162019

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 91.07 against 90.48 in Botswana, a difference of 0.59.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.

Botswana ranks 63rd and Namibia ranks 60th of 188 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) (, Botswana or Namibia?
Namibia, at 91.07 against 90.48 in Botswana as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( between Botswana and Namibia?
0.59, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Namibia?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Botswana and Namibia rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) (?
Botswana ranks 63rd and Namibia ranks 60th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the cost for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.