Lesotho vs Namibia: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) over time
- Lesotho
- Namibia
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 150 DB16-20 methodology against 145 DB16-20 methodology in Namibia, a difference of 5 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Lesotho has been ahead every year.
Lesotho ranks 140th and Namibia ranks 142nd of 186 countries.
Lesotho has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd), Lesotho or Namibia?
- Lesotho, at 150 DB16-20 methodology against 145 DB16-20 methodology in Namibia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) between Lesotho and Namibia?
- 5 DB16-20 methodology, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Namibia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Lesotho and Namibia rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd)?
- Lesotho ranks 140th and Namibia ranks 142nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost for border compliance to import records the cost associated with compliance with the economy’s customs regulations and with regulations relating to other inspections that are mandatory in order for the import shipment to cross the economy’s border, as well as the time and cost for handling that takes place at its port or border. It is calculated in US dollars. The cost for this segment include the cost for customs clearance and inspection procedures conducted by other agencies. For example, the cost for conducting a technical standard inspection would be included here. Informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.