Equatorial Guinea, Republic of vs Maldives: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD)

Equatorial Guinea, Republic of
985 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Maldives
980.5 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea, Republic of rank
16th
Maldives rank
17th

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) over time

  • Equatorial Guinea, Republic of
  • Maldives
02004006008001.0k201420162019

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea, Republic of currently reports 985 DB16-20 methodology against 980.5 DB16-20 methodology in Maldives, a difference of 4.5 DB16-20 methodology.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea, Republic of has been ahead every year.

Equatorial Guinea, Republic of ranks 16th and Maldives ranks 17th of 188 countries.

Equatorial Guinea, Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd), Equatorial Guinea, Republic of or Maldives?
Equatorial Guinea, Republic of, at 985 DB16-20 methodology against 980.5 DB16-20 methodology in Maldives as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) between Equatorial Guinea, Republic of and Maldives?
4.5 DB16-20 methodology, with Equatorial Guinea, Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea, Republic of and Maldives?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Equatorial Guinea, Republic of and Maldives rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd)?
Equatorial Guinea, Republic of ranks 16th and Maldives ranks 17th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea, Republic of vs Maldives: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD). Statizoid. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-border-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology/equatorial-guinea/maldives/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-border-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology/equatorial-guinea/maldives/">Equatorial Guinea, Republic of vs Maldives: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology)
Unit
DB16-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
188 places, 1,126 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The cost for border compliance to import records the cost associated with compliance with the economy’s customs regulations and with regulations relating to other inspections that are mandatory in order for the import shipment to cross the economy’s border, as well as the time and cost for handling that takes place at its port or border. It is calculated in US dollars. The cost for this segment include the cost for customs clearance and inspection procedures conducted by other agencies. For example, the cost for conducting a technical standard inspection would be included here. Informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.