Denmark vs Türkiye: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) over time
- Denmark
- Türkiye
How they compare
Türkiye currently reports 46 DB16-20 methodology against 0 DB16-20 methodology in Denmark, a difference of 46 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Türkiye has been ahead every year.
Denmark ranks 161st and Türkiye ranks 160th of 188 countries.
Türkiye has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd), Denmark or Türkiye?
- Türkiye, at 46 DB16-20 methodology against 0 DB16-20 methodology in Denmark as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) between Denmark and Türkiye?
- 46 DB16-20 methodology, with Türkiye ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Türkiye?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Denmark and Türkiye rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd)?
- Denmark ranks 161st and Türkiye ranks 160th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost for border compliance to import records the cost associated with compliance with the economy’s customs regulations and with regulations relating to other inspections that are mandatory in order for the import shipment to cross the economy’s border, as well as the time and cost for handling that takes place at its port or border. It is calculated in US dollars. The cost for this segment include the cost for customs clearance and inspection procedures conducted by other agencies. For example, the cost for conducting a technical standard inspection would be included here. Informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.