Cabo Verde vs Mauritania: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) over time
- Cabo Verde
- Mauritania
How they compare
Cabo Verde currently reports 587.5 DB16-20 methodology against 580 DB16-20 methodology in Mauritania, a difference of 7.5 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Cabo Verde has been ahead every year.
Cabo Verde ranks 54th and Mauritania ranks 55th of 188 countries.
Cabo Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd), Cabo Verde or Mauritania?
- Cabo Verde, at 587.5 DB16-20 methodology against 580 DB16-20 methodology in Mauritania as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) between Cabo Verde and Mauritania?
- 7.5 DB16-20 methodology, with Cabo Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Mauritania?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Cabo Verde and Mauritania rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd)?
- Cabo Verde ranks 54th and Mauritania ranks 55th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost for border compliance to import records the cost associated with compliance with the economy’s customs regulations and with regulations relating to other inspections that are mandatory in order for the import shipment to cross the economy’s border, as well as the time and cost for handling that takes place at its port or border. It is calculated in US dollars. The cost for this segment include the cost for customs clearance and inspection procedures conducted by other agencies. For example, the cost for conducting a technical standard inspection would be included here. Informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.