Argentina vs Gabon: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) over time
- Argentina
- Gabon
How they compare
Gabon currently reports 1,320 DB16-20 methodology against 1,200 DB16-20 methodology in Argentina, a difference of 120 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Gabon's figure about 1.1 times Argentina's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 10th and Gabon ranks 8th of 188 countries.
Gabon has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd), Argentina or Gabon?
- Gabon, at 1,320 DB16-20 methodology against 1,200 DB16-20 methodology in Argentina as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) between Argentina and Gabon?
- 120 DB16-20 methodology, with Gabon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Gabon?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Argentina and Gabon rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd)?
- Argentina ranks 10th and Gabon ranks 8th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost for border compliance to import records the cost associated with compliance with the economy’s customs regulations and with regulations relating to other inspections that are mandatory in order for the import shipment to cross the economy’s border, as well as the time and cost for handling that takes place at its port or border. It is calculated in US dollars. The cost for this segment include the cost for customs clearance and inspection procedures conducted by other agencies. For example, the cost for conducting a technical standard inspection would be included here. Informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.