Angola vs Equatorial Guinea, Republic of: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD)

Angola
1,030 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea, Republic of
985 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Angola rank
14th
Equatorial Guinea, Republic of rank
16th

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) over time

  • Angola
  • Equatorial Guinea, Republic of
02505007501.0k201420162019

How they compare

Angola currently reports 1,030 DB16-20 methodology against 985 DB16-20 methodology in Equatorial Guinea, Republic of, a difference of 45 DB16-20 methodology.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Angola has been ahead every year.

Angola ranks 14th and Equatorial Guinea, Republic of ranks 16th of 188 countries.

Angola has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd), Angola or Equatorial Guinea, Republic of?
Angola, at 1,030 DB16-20 methodology against 985 DB16-20 methodology in Equatorial Guinea, Republic of as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) between Angola and Equatorial Guinea, Republic of?
45 DB16-20 methodology, with Angola ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Equatorial Guinea, Republic of?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Angola and Equatorial Guinea, Republic of rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd)?
Angola ranks 14th and Equatorial Guinea, Republic of ranks 16th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Equatorial Guinea, Republic of: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD). Statizoid. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-border-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology/angola/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-border-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology/angola/equatorial-guinea/">Angola vs Equatorial Guinea, Republic of: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology)
Unit
DB16-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
188 places, 1,126 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The cost for border compliance to import records the cost associated with compliance with the economy’s customs regulations and with regulations relating to other inspections that are mandatory in order for the import shipment to cross the economy’s border, as well as the time and cost for handling that takes place at its port or border. It is calculated in US dollars. The cost for this segment include the cost for customs clearance and inspection procedures conducted by other agencies. For example, the cost for conducting a technical standard inspection would be included here. Informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.