San Marino vs Palestine, State of: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD)
San Marino
95.83
in 2019
Palestine, State of
95.83
in 2019
San Marino rank
30th
Palestine, State of rank
30th
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) over time
- San Marino
- Palestine, State of
How they compare
San Marino currently reports 95.83 against 95.83 in Palestine, State of, a difference of 0.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Palestine, State of has been ahead every year.
San Marino ranks 30th and Palestine, State of ranks 30th of 191 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd), San Marino or Palestine, State of?
- San Marino, at 95.83 against 95.83 in Palestine, State of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) between San Marino and Palestine, State of?
- 0, with San Marino ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for San Marino and Palestine, State of?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do San Marino and Palestine, State of rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd)?
- San Marino ranks 30th and Palestine, State of ranks 30th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.