Maldives vs Papua New Guinea: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD)
Maldives
18.29
in 2019
Papua New Guinea
21.67
in 2019
Maldives rank
173rd
Papua New Guinea rank
170th
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) over time
- Maldives
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 21.67 against 18.29 in Maldives, a difference of 3.38.
That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.2 times Maldives's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.
Maldives ranks 173rd and Papua New Guinea ranks 170th of 191 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd), Maldives or Papua New Guinea?
- Papua New Guinea, at 21.67 against 18.29 in Maldives as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) between Maldives and Papua New Guinea?
- 3.38, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Maldives and Papua New Guinea?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Maldives and Papua New Guinea rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd)?
- Maldives ranks 173rd and Papua New Guinea ranks 170th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.