Jordan vs Micronesia, Federated States of: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD)
Jordan
82.86
in 2019
Micronesia, Federated States of
85
in 2019
Jordan rank
53rd
Micronesia, Federated States of rank
51st
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) over time
- Jordan
- Micronesia, Federated States of
How they compare
Micronesia, Federated States of currently reports 85 against 82.86 in Jordan, a difference of 2.14.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Micronesia, Federated States of has been ahead every year.
Jordan ranks 53rd and Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 51st of 190 countries.
Micronesia, Federated States of has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd), Jordan or Micronesia, Federated States of?
- Micronesia, Federated States of, at 85 against 82.86 in Jordan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) between Jordan and Micronesia, Federated States of?
- 2.14, with Micronesia, Federated States of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Micronesia, Federated States of?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Jordan and Micronesia, Federated States of rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd)?
- Jordan ranks 53rd and Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 51st of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.