Hong Kong, China vs Uzbekistan: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD)
Hong Kong, China
77.86
in 2019
Uzbekistan
76.84
in 2019
Hong Kong, China rank
70th
Uzbekistan rank
72nd
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 77.86 against 76.84 in Uzbekistan, a difference of 1.02.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong, China ranks 70th and Uzbekistan ranks 72nd of 191 countries.
Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd), Hong Kong, China or Uzbekistan?
- Hong Kong, China, at 77.86 against 76.84 in Uzbekistan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) between Hong Kong, China and Uzbekistan?
- 1.02, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Uzbekistan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Uzbekistan rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd)?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 70th and Uzbekistan ranks 72nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.