What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) between Guinea-Bissau and United Arab Emirates?

0.28, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and United Arab Emirates?

6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.

Where does this data come from?

The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Guinea-Bissau vs United Arab Emirates: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD)

Guinea-Bissau

54.17

in 2019

United Arab Emirates

53.89

in 2019

Guinea-Bissau rank

127th

United Arab Emirates rank

129th

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) over time

Guinea-Bissau
United Arab Emirates

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 54.17 against 53.89 in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0.28.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Guinea-Bissau has been ahead every year.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 127th and United Arab Emirates ranks 129th of 191 countries.

Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd), Guinea-Bissau or United Arab Emirates?: Guinea-Bissau, at 54.17 against 53.89 in United Arab Emirates as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) between Guinea-Bissau and United Arab Emirates?: 0.28, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and United Arab Emirates?: 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Guinea-Bissau and United Arab Emirates rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd)?: Guinea-Bissau ranks 127th and United Arab Emirates ranks 129th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?: The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs United Arab Emirates: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD). Statizoid. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-border-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/guinea-bissau/united-arab-emirates/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-border-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/guinea-bissau/united-arab-emirates/">Guinea-Bissau vs United Arab Emirates: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 191 places, 1,145 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 24 August 2026

The score for the cost for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.