Equatorial Guinea vs Somalia: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD)
Equatorial Guinea
17.92
in 2019
Somalia
20.67
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea rank
173rd
Somalia rank
170th
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Somalia
How they compare
Somalia currently reports 20.67 against 17.92 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 2.75.
That makes Somalia's figure about 1.2 times Equatorial Guinea's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Somalia has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 173rd and Somalia ranks 170th of 190 countries.
Somalia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd), Equatorial Guinea or Somalia?
- Somalia, at 20.67 against 17.92 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) between Equatorial Guinea and Somalia?
- 2.75, with Somalia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Somalia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Somalia rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd)?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 173rd and Somalia ranks 170th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.