What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) between Djibouti and Equatorial Guinea?

5.84, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Equatorial Guinea?

6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.

Where does this data come from?

The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Djibouti vs Equatorial Guinea: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD)

Djibouti

12.08

in 2019

Equatorial Guinea

17.92

in 2019

Djibouti rank

177th

Equatorial Guinea rank

174th

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) over time

Djibouti
Equatorial Guinea

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 17.92 against 12.08 in Djibouti, a difference of 5.84.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.5 times Djibouti's.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.

Djibouti ranks 177th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 174th of 191 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd), Djibouti or Equatorial Guinea?: Equatorial Guinea, at 17.92 against 12.08 in Djibouti as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) between Djibouti and Equatorial Guinea?: 5.84, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Equatorial Guinea?: 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Djibouti and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd)?: Djibouti ranks 177th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 174th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?: The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Djibouti vs Equatorial Guinea: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD). Statizoid. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-border-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/djibouti/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-border-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/djibouti/equatorial-guinea/">Djibouti vs Equatorial Guinea: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 191 places, 1,145 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 24 August 2026

The score for the cost for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.