Congo vs Grenada: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16

Congo
0
in 2019
Grenada
0
in 2019
Congo rank
177th
Grenada rank
177th

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 over time

  • Congo
  • Grenada
00.20.40.60.81201420162019

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0 against 0 in Grenada, a difference of 0.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Grenada has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 177th and Grenada ranks 177th of 188 countries.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16, Congo or Grenada?
Congo, at 0 against 0 in Grenada as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 between Congo and Grenada?
0, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Grenada?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Congo and Grenada rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16?
Congo ranks 177th and Grenada ranks 177th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the cost for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.