China (People’s Republic of) vs Ireland: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD)
China (People’s Republic of)
79.9
in 2019
Ireland
78.92
in 2019
China (People’s Republic of) rank
63rd
Ireland rank
66th
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) over time
- China (People’s Republic of)
- Ireland
How they compare
China (People’s Republic of) currently reports 79.9 against 78.92 in Ireland, a difference of 0.98.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Ireland ahead.
China (People’s Republic of) ranks 63rd and Ireland ranks 66th of 190 countries.
Ireland has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd), China (People’s Republic of) or Ireland?
- China (People’s Republic of), at 79.9 against 78.92 in Ireland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) between China (People’s Republic of) and Ireland?
- 0.98, with China (People’s Republic of) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China (People’s Republic of) and Ireland?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do China (People’s Republic of) and Ireland rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd)?
- China (People’s Republic of) ranks 63rd and Ireland ranks 66th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.