What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) between China (People’s Republic of) and Ecuador?

0.73, with China (People’s Republic of) ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for China (People’s Republic of) and Ecuador?

6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.

Where does this data come from?

The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

China (People’s Republic of) vs Ecuador: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD)

China (People’s Republic of)

79.9

in 2019

Ecuador

79.17

in 2019

China (People’s Republic of) rank

63rd

Ecuador rank

65th

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) over time

China (People’s Republic of)
Ecuador

How they compare

China (People’s Republic of) currently reports 79.9 against 79.17 in Ecuador, a difference of 0.73.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Ecuador ahead.

China (People’s Republic of) ranks 63rd and Ecuador ranks 65th of 190 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd), China (People’s Republic of) or Ecuador?: China (People’s Republic of), at 79.9 against 79.17 in Ecuador as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) between China (People’s Republic of) and Ecuador?: 0.73, with China (People’s Republic of) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China (People’s Republic of) and Ecuador?: 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do China (People’s Republic of) and Ecuador rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd)?: China (People’s Republic of) ranks 63rd and Ecuador ranks 65th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?: The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China (People’s Republic of) vs Ecuador: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD). Statizoid. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-border-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/china/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-border-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/china/ecuador/">China (People’s Republic of) vs Ecuador: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.