Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Republic of Moldova: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD)
Bosnia and Herzegovina
90.96
in 2019
Republic of Moldova
93.1
in 2019
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
37th
Republic of Moldova rank
34th
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Republic of Moldova
How they compare
Republic of Moldova currently reports 93.1 against 90.96 in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 2.14.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Republic of Moldova has been ahead every year.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 37th and Republic of Moldova ranks 34th of 191 countries.
Republic of Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd), Bosnia and Herzegovina or Republic of Moldova?
- Republic of Moldova, at 93.1 against 90.96 in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republic of Moldova?
- 2.14, with Republic of Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republic of Moldova?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republic of Moldova rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd)?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 37th and Republic of Moldova ranks 34th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.