Bangladesh vs Syrian Arab Republic: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD)
Bangladesh
25
in 2019
Syrian Arab Republic
31.02
in 2019
Bangladesh rank
166th
Syrian Arab Republic rank
163rd
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) over time
- Bangladesh
- Syrian Arab Republic
How they compare
Syrian Arab Republic currently reports 31.02 against 25 in Bangladesh, a difference of 6.02.
That makes Syrian Arab Republic's figure about 1.2 times Bangladesh's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Syrian Arab Republic has been ahead every year.
Bangladesh ranks 166th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 163rd of 191 countries.
Syrian Arab Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd), Bangladesh or Syrian Arab Republic?
- Syrian Arab Republic, at 31.02 against 25 in Bangladesh as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) between Bangladesh and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 6.02, with Syrian Arab Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Bangladesh and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd)?
- Bangladesh ranks 166th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 163rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.