Antigua and Barbuda vs United Arab Emirates: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD)
Antigua and Barbuda
54.47
in 2019
United Arab Emirates
53.89
in 2019
Antigua and Barbuda rank
126th
United Arab Emirates rank
129th
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 54.47 against 53.89 in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0.58.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Antigua and Barbuda has been ahead every year.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 126th and United Arab Emirates ranks 129th of 191 countries.
Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd), Antigua and Barbuda or United Arab Emirates?
- Antigua and Barbuda, at 54.47 against 53.89 in United Arab Emirates as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) between Antigua and Barbuda and United Arab Emirates?
- 0.58, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and United Arab Emirates?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and United Arab Emirates rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd)?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 126th and United Arab Emirates ranks 129th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.