Namibia vs Palestine, State of: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated)

Namibia
1,650 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Palestine, State of
1,750 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Namibia rank
48th
Palestine, State of rank
44th

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated) over time

  • Namibia
  • Palestine, State of
05001.0k1.5k2.0k200520092014

How they compare

Palestine, State of currently reports 1,750 DB06-15 methodology against 1,650 DB06-15 methodology in Namibia, a difference of 100 DB06-15 methodology.

That makes Palestine, State of's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Namibia ahead.

Namibia ranks 48th and Palestine, State of ranks 44th of 183 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 1 and Palestine, State of in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia Palestine, State of Difference Ahead
2000s 1,728 DB06-15 methodology 1,337 DB06-15 methodology 391.04 DB06-15 methodology Namibia
2010s 1,442 DB06-15 methodology 1,777 DB06-15 methodology 334.61 DB06-15 methodology Palestine, State of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container deflated), Namibia or Palestine, State of?
Palestine, State of, at 1,750 DB06-15 methodology against 1,650 DB06-15 methodology in Namibia as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container deflated) between Namibia and Palestine, State of?
100 DB06-15 methodology, with Palestine, State of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Palestine, State of?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Namibia and Palestine, State of rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container deflated)?
Namibia ranks 48th and Palestine, State of ranks 44th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated) (DB06-15 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs Palestine, State of: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated). Statizoid. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-export-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/namibia/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-export-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/namibia/west-bank-and-gaza/">Namibia vs Palestine, State of: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated) (DB06-15 methodology)
Unit
DB06-15 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The cost to export records the cost associated with exporting a standardized cargo of goods by sea transport through 4 predefined stages: document preparation; customs clearance and inspections; inland transport and handling; and port and terminal handling. It is calculated in US dollars per container deflated. Cost measures the fees levied on the export of goods in a 20-foot container, in US dollars. All fees charged by government agencies and the private sector to a trader in the process of exporting and importing the goods are taken into account. These include but are not limited to costs for documents, administrative fees for customs clearance and inspections, customs broker fees, port-related charges and inland transport costs. Only official costs are recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.