Korea vs United Arab Emirates: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated)

Korea
670 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
United Arab Emirates
665 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Korea rank
164th
United Arab Emirates rank
165th

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated) over time

  • Korea
  • United Arab Emirates
02004006008001.0k200520092014

How they compare

Korea currently reports 670 DB06-15 methodology against 665 DB06-15 methodology in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 5 DB06-15 methodology.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was United Arab Emirates ahead.

Korea ranks 164th and United Arab Emirates ranks 165th of 183 countries.

United Arab Emirates has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Korea United Arab Emirates Difference Ahead
2000s 779.55 DB06-15 methodology 785.27 DB06-15 methodology 5.72 DB06-15 methodology United Arab Emirates
2010s 650.19 DB06-15 methodology 686.38 DB06-15 methodology 36.18 DB06-15 methodology United Arab Emirates

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container deflated), Korea or United Arab Emirates?
Korea, at 670 DB06-15 methodology against 665 DB06-15 methodology in United Arab Emirates as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container deflated) between Korea and United Arab Emirates?
5 DB06-15 methodology, with Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Korea and United Arab Emirates?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Korea and United Arab Emirates rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container deflated)?
Korea ranks 164th and United Arab Emirates ranks 165th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated) (DB06-15 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Korea vs United Arab Emirates: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated). Statizoid. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-export-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/korea-rep/united-arab-emirates/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-export-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/korea-rep/united-arab-emirates/">Korea vs United Arab Emirates: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated) (DB06-15 methodology)
Unit
DB06-15 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The cost to export records the cost associated with exporting a standardized cargo of goods by sea transport through 4 predefined stages: document preparation; customs clearance and inspections; inland transport and handling; and port and terminal handling. It is calculated in US dollars per container deflated. Cost measures the fees levied on the export of goods in a 20-foot container, in US dollars. All fees charged by government agencies and the private sector to a trader in the process of exporting and importing the goods are taken into account. These include but are not limited to costs for documents, administrative fees for customs clearance and inspections, customs broker fees, port-related charges and inland transport costs. Only official costs are recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.