Iran, Islamic Republic of vs Papua New Guinea: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated)

Iran, Islamic Republic of
1,350 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Papua New Guinea
1,335 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Iran, Islamic Republic of rank
74th
Papua New Guinea rank
75th

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated) over time

  • Iran, Islamic Republic of
  • Papua New Guinea
01.0k2.0k3.0k200520092014

How they compare

Iran, Islamic Republic of currently reports 1,350 DB06-15 methodology against 1,335 DB06-15 methodology in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 15 DB06-15 methodology.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Iran, Islamic Republic of has been ahead every year.

Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 74th and Papua New Guinea ranks 75th of 183 countries.

Iran, Islamic Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iran, Islamic Republic of Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
2000s 2,504 DB06-15 methodology 1,319 DB06-15 methodology 1,185 DB06-15 methodology Iran, Islamic Republic of
2010s 1,775 DB06-15 methodology 1,210 DB06-15 methodology 564.55 DB06-15 methodology Iran, Islamic Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container deflated), Iran, Islamic Republic of or Papua New Guinea?
Iran, Islamic Republic of, at 1,350 DB06-15 methodology against 1,335 DB06-15 methodology in Papua New Guinea as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container deflated) between Iran, Islamic Republic of and Papua New Guinea?
15 DB06-15 methodology, with Iran, Islamic Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iran, Islamic Republic of and Papua New Guinea?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Iran, Islamic Republic of and Papua New Guinea rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container deflated)?
Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 74th and Papua New Guinea ranks 75th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated) (DB06-15 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iran, Islamic Republic of vs Papua New Guinea: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated). Statizoid. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-export-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/iran-islamic-rep/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-export-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/iran-islamic-rep/papua-new-guinea/">Iran, Islamic Republic of vs Papua New Guinea: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated) (DB06-15 methodology)
Unit
DB06-15 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The cost to export records the cost associated with exporting a standardized cargo of goods by sea transport through 4 predefined stages: document preparation; customs clearance and inspections; inland transport and handling; and port and terminal handling. It is calculated in US dollars per container deflated. Cost measures the fees levied on the export of goods in a 20-foot container, in US dollars. All fees charged by government agencies and the private sector to a trader in the process of exporting and importing the goods are taken into account. These include but are not limited to costs for documents, administrative fees for customs clearance and inspections, customs broker fees, port-related charges and inland transport costs. Only official costs are recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.