Hong Kong, China vs Morocco: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated)

Hong Kong, China
590 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Morocco
595 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Hong Kong, China rank
175th
Morocco rank
173rd

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated) over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Morocco
0200400600200520092014

How they compare

Morocco currently reports 595 DB06-15 methodology against 590 DB06-15 methodology in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 5 DB06-15 methodology.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Morocco ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 175th and Morocco ranks 173rd of 183 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 1 and Morocco in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Morocco Difference Ahead
2000s 587.77 DB06-15 methodology 627.54 DB06-15 methodology 39.77 DB06-15 methodology Morocco
2010s 602.85 DB06-15 methodology 597.07 DB06-15 methodology 5.78 DB06-15 methodology Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container deflated), Hong Kong, China or Morocco?
Morocco, at 595 DB06-15 methodology against 590 DB06-15 methodology in Hong Kong, China as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container deflated) between Hong Kong, China and Morocco?
5 DB06-15 methodology, with Morocco ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Morocco?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Hong Kong, China and Morocco rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container deflated)?
Hong Kong, China ranks 175th and Morocco ranks 173rd of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated) (DB06-15 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Morocco: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated). Statizoid. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-export-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/hong-kong-sar-china/morocco/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-export-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/hong-kong-sar-china/morocco/">Hong Kong, China vs Morocco: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated) (DB06-15 methodology)
Unit
DB06-15 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The cost to export records the cost associated with exporting a standardized cargo of goods by sea transport through 4 predefined stages: document preparation; customs clearance and inspections; inland transport and handling; and port and terminal handling. It is calculated in US dollars per container deflated. Cost measures the fees levied on the export of goods in a 20-foot container, in US dollars. All fees charged by government agencies and the private sector to a trader in the process of exporting and importing the goods are taken into account. These include but are not limited to costs for documents, administrative fees for customs clearance and inspections, customs broker fees, port-related charges and inland transport costs. Only official costs are recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.