Hong Kong, China vs Latvia: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated)
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated) over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 600 DB06-15 methodology against 590 DB06-15 methodology in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 10 DB06-15 methodology.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Latvia ahead.
Hong Kong, China ranks 176th and Latvia ranks 173rd of 184 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 587.77 DB06-15 methodology | 881.7 DB06-15 methodology | 293.93 DB06-15 methodology | Latvia |
| 2010s | 602.85 DB06-15 methodology | 632.93 DB06-15 methodology | 30.08 DB06-15 methodology | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container deflated), Hong Kong, China or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 600 DB06-15 methodology against 590 DB06-15 methodology in Hong Kong, China as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container deflated) between Hong Kong, China and Latvia?
- 10 DB06-15 methodology, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Latvia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Latvia rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container deflated)?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 176th and Latvia ranks 173rd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated) (DB06-15 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to export records the cost associated with exporting a standardized cargo of goods by sea transport through 4 predefined stages: document preparation; customs clearance and inspections; inland transport and handling; and port and terminal handling. It is calculated in US dollars per container deflated. Cost measures the fees levied on the export of goods in a 20-foot container, in US dollars. All fees charged by government agencies and the private sector to a trader in the process of exporting and importing the goods are taken into account. These include but are not limited to costs for documents, administrative fees for customs clearance and inspections, customs broker fees, port-related charges and inland transport costs. Only official costs are recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.