Hong Kong, China vs Indonesia: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated)

Hong Kong, China
590 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Indonesia
571.8 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Hong Kong, China rank
176th
Indonesia rank
178th

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated) over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Indonesia
02505007501.0k1.2k200520092014

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 590 DB06-15 methodology against 571.8 DB06-15 methodology in Indonesia, a difference of 18.2 DB06-15 methodology.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Indonesia ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 176th and Indonesia ranks 178th of 184 countries.

Indonesia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Indonesia Difference Ahead
2000s 587.77 DB06-15 methodology 1,039 DB06-15 methodology 451.23 DB06-15 methodology Indonesia
2010s 602.85 DB06-15 methodology 694.35 DB06-15 methodology 91.5 DB06-15 methodology Indonesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container deflated), Hong Kong, China or Indonesia?
Hong Kong, China, at 590 DB06-15 methodology against 571.8 DB06-15 methodology in Indonesia as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container deflated) between Hong Kong, China and Indonesia?
18.2 DB06-15 methodology, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Indonesia?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Hong Kong, China and Indonesia rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container deflated)?
Hong Kong, China ranks 176th and Indonesia ranks 178th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated) (DB06-15 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Indonesia: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated). Statizoid. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-export-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/hong-kong-sar-china/indonesia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-export-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/hong-kong-sar-china/indonesia/">Hong Kong, China vs Indonesia: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated) (DB06-15 methodology)
Unit
DB06-15 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
184 places, 1,819 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The cost to export records the cost associated with exporting a standardized cargo of goods by sea transport through 4 predefined stages: document preparation; customs clearance and inspections; inland transport and handling; and port and terminal handling. It is calculated in US dollars per container deflated. Cost measures the fees levied on the export of goods in a 20-foot container, in US dollars. All fees charged by government agencies and the private sector to a trader in the process of exporting and importing the goods are taken into account. These include but are not limited to costs for documents, administrative fees for customs clearance and inspections, customs broker fees, port-related charges and inland transport costs. Only official costs are recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.