Dominican Republic vs El Salvador: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated)

Dominican Republic
1,040 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
El Salvador
1,045 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Dominican Republic rank
115th
El Salvador rank
113th

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated) over time

  • Dominican Republic
  • El Salvador
05001.0k1.5k200520092014

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 1,045 DB06-15 methodology against 1,040 DB06-15 methodology in Dominican Republic, a difference of 5 DB06-15 methodology.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Dominican Republic ahead.

Dominican Republic ranks 115th and El Salvador ranks 113th of 184 countries.

Dominican Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominican Republic El Salvador Difference Ahead
2000s 1,220 DB06-15 methodology 852.21 DB06-15 methodology 367.35 DB06-15 methodology Dominican Republic
2010s 1,129 DB06-15 methodology 1,007 DB06-15 methodology 122.56 DB06-15 methodology Dominican Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container deflated), Dominican Republic or El Salvador?
El Salvador, at 1,045 DB06-15 methodology against 1,040 DB06-15 methodology in Dominican Republic as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container deflated) between Dominican Republic and El Salvador?
5 DB06-15 methodology, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and El Salvador?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Dominican Republic and El Salvador rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container deflated)?
Dominican Republic ranks 115th and El Salvador ranks 113th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated) (DB06-15 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dominican Republic vs El Salvador: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated). Statizoid. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-export-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/dominican-republic/el-salvador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-export-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/dominican-republic/el-salvador/">Dominican Republic vs El Salvador: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated) (DB06-15 methodology)
Unit
DB06-15 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
184 places, 1,819 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The cost to export records the cost associated with exporting a standardized cargo of goods by sea transport through 4 predefined stages: document preparation; customs clearance and inspections; inland transport and handling; and port and terminal handling. It is calculated in US dollars per container deflated. Cost measures the fees levied on the export of goods in a 20-foot container, in US dollars. All fees charged by government agencies and the private sector to a trader in the process of exporting and importing the goods are taken into account. These include but are not limited to costs for documents, administrative fees for customs clearance and inspections, customs broker fees, port-related charges and inland transport costs. Only official costs are recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.