Côte d'Ivoire vs North Macedonia: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated)

Côte d'Ivoire
1,390 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
North Macedonia
1,376 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Côte d'Ivoire rank
67th
North Macedonia rank
70th

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated) over time

  • Côte d'Ivoire
  • North Macedonia
05001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k200520092014

How they compare

Côte d'Ivoire currently reports 1,390 DB06-15 methodology against 1,376 DB06-15 methodology in North Macedonia, a difference of 14 DB06-15 methodology.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Côte d'Ivoire has been ahead every year.

Côte d'Ivoire ranks 67th and North Macedonia ranks 70th of 184 countries.

Côte d'Ivoire has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Côte d'Ivoire North Macedonia Difference Ahead
2000s 2,154 DB06-15 methodology 1,477 DB06-15 methodology 677.21 DB06-15 methodology Côte d'Ivoire
2010s 1,882 DB06-15 methodology 1,403 DB06-15 methodology 478.55 DB06-15 methodology Côte d'Ivoire

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container deflated), Côte d'Ivoire or North Macedonia?
Côte d'Ivoire, at 1,390 DB06-15 methodology against 1,376 DB06-15 methodology in North Macedonia as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container deflated) between Côte d'Ivoire and North Macedonia?
14 DB06-15 methodology, with Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and North Macedonia?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Côte d'Ivoire and North Macedonia rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container deflated)?
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 67th and North Macedonia ranks 70th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated) (DB06-15 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Côte d'Ivoire vs North Macedonia: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated). Statizoid. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-export-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/cote-d-ivoire/north-macedonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-export-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/cote-d-ivoire/north-macedonia/">Côte d'Ivoire vs North Macedonia: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated) (DB06-15 methodology)
Unit
DB06-15 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
184 places, 1,819 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The cost to export records the cost associated with exporting a standardized cargo of goods by sea transport through 4 predefined stages: document preparation; customs clearance and inspections; inland transport and handling; and port and terminal handling. It is calculated in US dollars per container deflated. Cost measures the fees levied on the export of goods in a 20-foot container, in US dollars. All fees charged by government agencies and the private sector to a trader in the process of exporting and importing the goods are taken into account. These include but are not limited to costs for documents, administrative fees for customs clearance and inspections, customs broker fees, port-related charges and inland transport costs. Only official costs are recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.