Antigua and Barbuda vs Mozambique: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated)

Antigua and Barbuda
1,090 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Mozambique
1,100 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Antigua and Barbuda rank
104th
Mozambique rank
103rd

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated) over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Mozambique
05001.0k1.5k2.0k200520092014

How they compare

Mozambique currently reports 1,100 DB06-15 methodology against 1,090 DB06-15 methodology in Antigua and Barbuda, a difference of 10 DB06-15 methodology.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Mozambique has been ahead every year.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 104th and Mozambique ranks 103rd of 183 countries.

Mozambique has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Mozambique Difference Ahead
2000s 1,326 DB06-15 methodology 1,743 DB06-15 methodology 416.76 DB06-15 methodology Mozambique
2010s 1,119 DB06-15 methodology 1,246 DB06-15 methodology 127.05 DB06-15 methodology Mozambique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container deflated), Antigua and Barbuda or Mozambique?
Mozambique, at 1,100 DB06-15 methodology against 1,090 DB06-15 methodology in Antigua and Barbuda as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container deflated) between Antigua and Barbuda and Mozambique?
10 DB06-15 methodology, with Mozambique ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Mozambique?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Mozambique rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container deflated)?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 104th and Mozambique ranks 103rd of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated) (DB06-15 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs Mozambique: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated). Statizoid. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-export-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/antigua-and-barbuda/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-export-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/antigua-and-barbuda/mozambique/">Antigua and Barbuda vs Mozambique: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated) (DB06-15 methodology)
Unit
DB06-15 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The cost to export records the cost associated with exporting a standardized cargo of goods by sea transport through 4 predefined stages: document preparation; customs clearance and inspections; inland transport and handling; and port and terminal handling. It is calculated in US dollars per container deflated. Cost measures the fees levied on the export of goods in a 20-foot container, in US dollars. All fees charged by government agencies and the private sector to a trader in the process of exporting and importing the goods are taken into account. These include but are not limited to costs for documents, administrative fees for customs clearance and inspections, customs broker fees, port-related charges and inland transport costs. Only official costs are recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.