Antigua and Barbuda vs Lebanon: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated)

Antigua and Barbuda
1,090 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Lebanon
1,080 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Antigua and Barbuda rank
105th
Lebanon rank
108th

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated) over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Lebanon
05001.0k1.5k200520092014

How they compare

Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 1,090 DB06-15 methodology against 1,080 DB06-15 methodology in Lebanon, a difference of 10 DB06-15 methodology.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 105th and Lebanon ranks 108th of 184 countries.

Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Lebanon Difference Ahead
2000s 1,326 DB06-15 methodology 1,214 DB06-15 methodology 112.64 DB06-15 methodology Antigua and Barbuda
2010s 1,119 DB06-15 methodology 1,077 DB06-15 methodology 42.33 DB06-15 methodology Antigua and Barbuda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container deflated), Antigua and Barbuda or Lebanon?
Antigua and Barbuda, at 1,090 DB06-15 methodology against 1,080 DB06-15 methodology in Lebanon as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container deflated) between Antigua and Barbuda and Lebanon?
10 DB06-15 methodology, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Lebanon?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Lebanon rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container deflated)?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 105th and Lebanon ranks 108th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated) (DB06-15 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs Lebanon: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated). Statizoid. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-export-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/antigua-and-barbuda/lebanon/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-export-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/antigua-and-barbuda/lebanon/">Antigua and Barbuda vs Lebanon: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated) (DB06-15 methodology)
Unit
DB06-15 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
184 places, 1,819 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The cost to export records the cost associated with exporting a standardized cargo of goods by sea transport through 4 predefined stages: document preparation; customs clearance and inspections; inland transport and handling; and port and terminal handling. It is calculated in US dollars per container deflated. Cost measures the fees levied on the export of goods in a 20-foot container, in US dollars. All fees charged by government agencies and the private sector to a trader in the process of exporting and importing the goods are taken into account. These include but are not limited to costs for documents, administrative fees for customs clearance and inspections, customs broker fees, port-related charges and inland transport costs. Only official costs are recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.