Venezuela vs Zimbabwe: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15)
Venezuela
32.9
in 2014
Zimbabwe
16.01
in 2014
Venezuela rank
171st
Zimbabwe rank
174th
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) over time
- Venezuela
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Venezuela currently reports 32.9 against 16.01 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 16.89.
That makes Venezuela's figure about 2.1 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Venezuela ranks 171st and Zimbabwe ranks 174th of 183 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Venezuela | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9.35 | 30.16 | 20.81 | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 7.78 | 29.06 | 21.28 | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15), Venezuela or Zimbabwe?
- Venezuela, at 32.9 against 16.01 in Zimbabwe as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) between Venezuela and Zimbabwe?
- 16.89, with Venezuela ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Venezuela and Zimbabwe?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Venezuela and Zimbabwe rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15)?
- Venezuela ranks 171st and Zimbabwe ranks 174th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.