Sri Lanka vs Tonga: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me

Sri Lanka
96.73
in 2014
Tonga
97.71
in 2014
Sri Lanka rank
6th
Tonga rank
4th

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time

  • Sri Lanka
  • Tonga
020406080100200520092014

How they compare

Tonga currently reports 97.71 against 96.73 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.98.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Tonga has been ahead every year.

Sri Lanka ranks 6th and Tonga ranks 4th of 181 countries.

Tonga has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sri Lanka Tonga Difference Ahead
2000s 86.55 94.06 7.52 Tonga
2010s 94.03 97.75 3.72 Tonga

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Sri Lanka or Tonga?
Tonga, at 97.71 against 96.73 in Sri Lanka as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Sri Lanka and Tonga?
0.98, with Tonga ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Tonga?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Sri Lanka and Tonga rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
Sri Lanka ranks 6th and Tonga ranks 4th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.