South Africa vs Ukraine: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15)
South Africa
69.06
in 2014
Ukraine
67.97
in 2014
South Africa rank
143rd
Ukraine rank
146th
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) over time
- South Africa
- Ukraine
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 69.06 against 67.97 in Ukraine, a difference of 1.09.
Across all 10 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.
South Africa ranks 143rd and Ukraine ranks 146th of 183 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Africa | Ukraine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 66.46 | 29.43 | 37.03 | South Africa |
| 2010s | 69.05 | 63.47 | 5.58 | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15), South Africa or Ukraine?
- South Africa, at 69.06 against 67.97 in Ukraine as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) between South Africa and Ukraine?
- 1.09, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Ukraine?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do South Africa and Ukraine rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15)?
- South Africa ranks 143rd and Ukraine ranks 146th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.