Singapore vs Timor-Leste: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15)
Singapore
98.91
in 2014
Timor-Leste
100
in 2014
Singapore rank
2nd
Timor-Leste rank
1st
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) over time
- Singapore
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Timor-Leste currently reports 100 against 98.91 in Singapore, a difference of 1.09.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Singapore ahead.
Singapore ranks 2nd and Timor-Leste ranks 1st of 183 countries.
Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Singapore | Timor-Leste | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 99.59 | 90.11 | 9.48 | Singapore |
| 2010s | 99.58 | 98.26 | 1.32 | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15), Singapore or Timor-Leste?
- Timor-Leste, at 100 against 98.91 in Singapore as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) between Singapore and Timor-Leste?
- 1.09, with Timor-Leste ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Singapore and Timor-Leste?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Singapore and Timor-Leste rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15)?
- Singapore ranks 2nd and Timor-Leste ranks 1st of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.