Samoa vs East Timor: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me

Samoa
98.26
in 2014
East Timor
100
in 2014
Samoa rank
3rd
East Timor rank
1st

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time

  • Samoa
  • East Timor
020406080100200520092014

How they compare

East Timor currently reports 100 against 98.26 in Samoa, a difference of 1.74.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Samoa ahead.

Samoa ranks 3rd and East Timor ranks 1st of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Samoa averaged higher in 1 and East Timor in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Samoa East Timor Difference Ahead
2000s 91.81 90.11 1.71 Samoa
2010s 97.95 98.26 0.3185 East Timor

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Samoa or East Timor?
East Timor, at 100 against 98.26 in Samoa as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Samoa and East Timor?
1.74, with East Timor ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Samoa and East Timor?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Samoa and East Timor rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
Samoa ranks 3rd and East Timor ranks 1st of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.