Samoa vs Sri Lanka: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me

Samoa
98.26
in 2014
Sri Lanka
96.73
in 2014
Samoa rank
3rd
Sri Lanka rank
6th

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time

  • Samoa
  • Sri Lanka
020406080100200520092014

How they compare

Samoa currently reports 98.26 against 96.73 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 1.53.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Samoa has been ahead every year.

Samoa ranks 3rd and Sri Lanka ranks 6th of 181 countries.

Samoa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Samoa Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
2000s 91.81 86.55 5.27 Samoa
2010s 97.95 94.03 3.91 Samoa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Samoa or Sri Lanka?
Samoa, at 98.26 against 96.73 in Sri Lanka as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Samoa and Sri Lanka?
1.53, with Samoa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Samoa and Sri Lanka?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Samoa and Sri Lanka rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
Samoa ranks 3rd and Sri Lanka ranks 6th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.