Samoa vs Singapore: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me

Samoa
98.26
in 2014
Singapore
98.91
in 2014
Samoa rank
3rd
Singapore rank
2nd

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time

  • Samoa
  • Singapore
020406080100200520092014

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 98.91 against 98.26 in Samoa, a difference of 0.65.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.

Samoa ranks 3rd and Singapore ranks 2nd of 181 countries.

Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Samoa Singapore Difference Ahead
2000s 91.81 99.59 7.77 Singapore
2010s 97.95 99.58 1.64 Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Samoa or Singapore?
Singapore, at 98.91 against 98.26 in Samoa as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Samoa and Singapore?
0.65, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Samoa and Singapore?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Samoa and Singapore rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
Samoa ranks 3rd and Singapore ranks 2nd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.