Rwanda vs Venezuela: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me
Rwanda
38.24
in 2014
Venezuela
32.9
in 2014
Rwanda rank
166th
Venezuela rank
169th
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time
- Rwanda
- Venezuela
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 38.24 against 32.9 in Venezuela, a difference of 5.34.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.2 times Venezuela's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Venezuela ahead.
Rwanda ranks 166th and Venezuela ranks 169th of 181 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Venezuela | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 25.06 | 9.35 | 15.72 | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 51.41 | 7.78 | 43.63 | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Rwanda or Venezuela?
- Rwanda, at 38.24 against 32.9 in Venezuela as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Rwanda and Venezuela?
- 5.34, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Venezuela?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Rwanda and Venezuela rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
- Rwanda ranks 166th and Venezuela ranks 169th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.