Romania vs Vanuatu: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me

Romania
76.58
in 2014
Vanuatu
76.47
in 2014
Romania rank
123rd
Vanuatu rank
124th

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time

  • Romania
  • Vanuatu
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Romania currently reports 76.58 against 76.47 in Vanuatu, a difference of 0.11.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Vanuatu ahead.

Romania ranks 123rd and Vanuatu ranks 124th of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Romania averaged higher in 1 and Vanuatu in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Romania Vanuatu Difference Ahead
2000s 66.69 66.3 0.3925 Romania
2010s 74.7 75.76 1.07 Vanuatu

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Romania or Vanuatu?
Romania, at 76.58 against 76.47 in Vanuatu as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Romania and Vanuatu?
0.11, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Vanuatu?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Romania and Vanuatu rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
Romania ranks 123rd and Vanuatu ranks 124th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.