Qatar vs Turkey: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me

Qatar
88.74
in 2014
Turkey
87.36
in 2014
Qatar rank
57th
Turkey rank
60th

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time

  • Qatar
  • Turkey
020406080100200520092014

How they compare

Qatar currently reports 88.74 against 87.36 in Turkey, a difference of 1.38.

Across all 8 years both countries report, Qatar has been ahead every year.

Qatar ranks 57th and Turkey ranks 60th of 181 countries.

Qatar has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Qatar Turkey Difference Ahead
2000s 87.94 78.41 9.52 Qatar
2010s 87.33 84.26 3.07 Qatar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Qatar or Turkey?
Qatar, at 88.74 against 87.36 in Turkey as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Qatar and Turkey?
1.38, with Qatar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Qatar and Turkey?
8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2014.
How do Qatar and Turkey rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
Qatar ranks 57th and Turkey ranks 60th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.