Poland vs Yemen: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me

Poland
86.06
in 2014
Yemen
85.73
in 2014
Poland rank
72nd
Yemen rank
75th

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time

  • Poland
  • Yemen
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Poland currently reports 86.06 against 85.73 in Yemen, a difference of 0.33.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Poland ahead.

Poland ranks 72nd and Yemen ranks 75th of 181 countries.

Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Poland Yemen Difference Ahead
2000s 86.8 71.6 15.2 Poland
2010s 85.96 84.48 1.48 Poland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Poland or Yemen?
Poland, at 86.06 against 85.73 in Yemen as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Poland and Yemen?
0.33, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Yemen?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Poland and Yemen rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
Poland ranks 72nd and Yemen ranks 75th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.