Paraguay vs Ukraine: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me

Paraguay
68.63
in 2014
Ukraine
67.97
in 2014
Paraguay rank
142nd
Ukraine rank
144th

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time

  • Paraguay
  • Ukraine
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Paraguay currently reports 68.63 against 67.97 in Ukraine, a difference of 0.66.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Paraguay has been ahead every year.

Paraguay ranks 142nd and Ukraine ranks 144th of 181 countries.

Paraguay has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Paraguay Ukraine Difference Ahead
2000s 66.71 29.43 37.27 Paraguay
2010s 71.1 63.47 7.62 Paraguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Paraguay or Ukraine?
Paraguay, at 68.63 against 67.97 in Ukraine as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Paraguay and Ukraine?
0.66, with Paraguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Paraguay and Ukraine?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Paraguay and Ukraine rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
Paraguay ranks 142nd and Ukraine ranks 144th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.