Panama vs United Arab Emirates: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15)
Panama
94.44
in 2014
United Arab Emirates
94.44
in 2014
Panama rank
18th
United Arab Emirates rank
18th
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) over time
- Panama
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
Panama currently reports 94.44 against 94.44 in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Panama ahead.
Panama ranks 18th and United Arab Emirates ranks 18th of 183 countries.
Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Panama | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 97.23 | 91.82 | 5.41 | Panama |
| 2010s | 95.83 | 93.98 | 1.85 | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15), Panama or United Arab Emirates?
- Panama, at 94.44 against 94.44 in United Arab Emirates as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) between Panama and United Arab Emirates?
- 0, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and United Arab Emirates?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Panama and United Arab Emirates rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15)?
- Panama ranks 18th and United Arab Emirates ranks 18th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.