Pakistan vs Philippines: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me
Pakistan
92.27
in 2014
Philippines
92.48
in 2014
Pakistan rank
33rd
Philippines rank
32nd
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time
- Pakistan
- Philippines
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 92.48 against 92.27 in Pakistan, a difference of 0.21.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Philippines has been ahead every year.
Pakistan ranks 33rd and Philippines ranks 32nd of 181 countries.
Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Pakistan | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 75.56 | 87.51 | 11.95 | Philippines |
| 2010s | 90.83 | 94.33 | 3.5 | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Pakistan or Philippines?
- Philippines, at 92.48 against 92.27 in Pakistan as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Pakistan and Philippines?
- 0.21, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Philippines?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Pakistan and Philippines rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
- Pakistan ranks 33rd and Philippines ranks 32nd of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.