Norway vs Saudi Arabia: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15)
Norway
81.37
in 2014
Saudi Arabia
80.94
in 2014
Norway rank
97th
Saudi Arabia rank
100th
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) over time
- Norway
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Norway currently reports 81.37 against 80.94 in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0.43.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Norway ahead.
Norway ranks 97th and Saudi Arabia ranks 100th of 183 countries.
Saudi Arabia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Norway | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 85.59 | 88.03 | 2.44 | Saudi Arabia |
| 2010s | 81.59 | 86.12 | 4.53 | Saudi Arabia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15), Norway or Saudi Arabia?
- Norway, at 81.37 against 80.94 in Saudi Arabia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) between Norway and Saudi Arabia?
- 0.43, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Saudi Arabia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Norway and Saudi Arabia rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15)?
- Norway ranks 97th and Saudi Arabia ranks 100th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.