Niger vs Zambia: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me

Niger
11.44
in 2014
Zambia
0
in 2014
Niger rank
173rd
Zambia rank
175th

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time

  • Niger
  • Zambia
0102030200520092014

How they compare

Niger currently reports 11.44 against 0 in Zambia, a difference of 11.44.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Niger has been ahead every year.

Niger ranks 173rd and Zambia ranks 175th of 181 countries.

Niger has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Niger Zambia Difference Ahead
2000s 24.28 9.2 15.08 Niger
2010s 21.77 1.02 20.75 Niger

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Niger or Zambia?
Niger, at 11.44 against 0 in Zambia as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Niger and Zambia?
11.44, with Niger ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Niger and Zambia?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Niger and Zambia rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
Niger ranks 173rd and Zambia ranks 175th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.