Nicaragua vs Uruguay: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me

Nicaragua
84.1
in 2014
Uruguay
84.42
in 2014
Nicaragua rank
83rd
Uruguay rank
81st

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time

  • Nicaragua
  • Uruguay
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 84.42 against 84.1 in Nicaragua, a difference of 0.32.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.

Nicaragua ranks 83rd and Uruguay ranks 81st of 181 countries.

Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nicaragua Uruguay Difference Ahead
2000s 63.69 74.26 10.57 Uruguay
2010s 78.95 80.59 1.64 Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Nicaragua or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 84.42 against 84.1 in Nicaragua as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Nicaragua and Uruguay?
0.32, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Uruguay?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Nicaragua and Uruguay rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
Nicaragua ranks 83rd and Uruguay ranks 81st of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.