Nicaragua vs Sierra Leone: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15)
Nicaragua
84.1
in 2014
Sierra Leone
83.12
in 2014
Nicaragua rank
84th
Sierra Leone rank
87th
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) over time
- Nicaragua
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 84.1 against 83.12 in Sierra Leone, a difference of 0.98.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Nicaragua has been ahead every year.
Nicaragua ranks 84th and Sierra Leone ranks 87th of 183 countries.
Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 63.69 | 53.46 | 10.24 | Nicaragua |
| 2010s | 78.95 | 73.53 | 5.42 | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15), Nicaragua or Sierra Leone?
- Nicaragua, at 84.1 against 83.12 in Sierra Leone as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) between Nicaragua and Sierra Leone?
- 0.98, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Sierra Leone?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Nicaragua and Sierra Leone rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15)?
- Nicaragua ranks 84th and Sierra Leone ranks 87th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.